Blog
CLAT 2023 EXAM ANALYSIS
Clat 2023 concluded at 4 pM on 18th dec 2022.The Major highlights, cutoffs, detailed analysis of clat 2023 exam paper is mentioned below:
Exam Interface
1.CLAT CONSORTIUM conducted the paper Offline.
Overall Analysis
1.Paper was reasonably lengthy.
2.Overall paper was moderate, high attempt rate.
3.Cut off is expected to be in and around or even more than last year.
4.Current Affairs continued to rule the exam!
English
Insights which highlight our competence with regards to the section :
1. We prioritize heavy eclectic reading. Which was the name of the game of this paper.
2. Almost all the question types from Inference, to what the author’s thought process is were covered by us in mock.
3. A direct word from our mocks has matched (Anachronistic, illicit, covert,
4. source of essay – non fiction essay, poem, fiction
4. Length would not have been a problem for the students because of the varying lengths of the passages in our mocks.
5. The focus on drawing the intent and the mindset of the author which we prioritize in our passages and classes has been the base of close to all the Inference questions.
English List of topics
Current Affairs
- Moderate to difficult.
- Certain topics like the presidential elections, sports and agriculture were expected and done with the students.
- However there were other topics that were tough and unexpected which was felt by all students.
Data Interpretation
Total Questions: 15
- 3 sets – 5 Questions each
- All passage based
- No visual data (graphs/charts) JUST LIKE Last year
- Time required to tabulate the data
- 2 sets were too diffficult, lengthy, calculative.Only one set of avg based was doable.
Logical Reasoning
Total Questions: 30
Good Score: 22-25
Inference – 15
Weaken – 7
What will solve a problem presented in the passage (take the options to be true) – 4
Strengthen – 2
Assumption – 1
Author would disagree with what – 1Total – 30
Legal Reasoning
Total Questions: 40
Ideal Score: 28-30
Paper was lengthy but easy
Legal was moderate. All the passages were from current legal topics and none of the passages were from core legal issues. Section was lengthy.
