Blog
ERRATA IN CLAT 2017 EXAM PAPER & ANSWER KEY
- May 19, 2017
- Posted by: admin
- Category: Results Tips for Law Entrance Exams
ERRATA IN CLAT 2017 EXAM PAPER & ANSWER KEY
Maths/AR Errata CLAT 2017
Q Code | Given Answer | Correct Answer | Attachment Explanation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392782 | 11/18 | 13/18 | Let total number of workers be 900. Then, Number of males = 1/3 * 900 = 300
Now, Married men = ½ * 300 = 150 Married men with children = 1/3 * 150 = 50 Now, Number of Females = 900 – 300 = 600 Number of married women = ¾ * 600 = 450 Number of married women with children = 2/3 of 2/3 of 450 = 200 Total married worker with children = 50 + 200 = 250 Now, Number of workers without children = 900 – 250 = 650 Thus, fraction of workers without children = 650/ 900 = 13/18 (No option is available for the same).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392857 | D | C | As, three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice , this means A and C are not doctors while B is not a painter.
Also, Doctor prefers Rice and Painter prefers Chapatti. Further, it is given that the Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice. This means, Teacher and D would prefer Chapatti as it is already known (in above table) that A prefers Rice. Further, as three of them prefer Rice, so E must prefer Rice. Now as A, C and Doctor prefers rice, E should be the doctor (as the other two aren’t). Also, it is known that painter prefers Chapatti, so the only possibility – D should be the painter. Further, as Teacher also prefers Chapatti – this means B is the Teacher.
From the last statement : The Singer is C’s brother – we get that C is not the singer. This means A is the singer and C is the dancer. Hence, the final table looks like –
Given Answer is D but correct answer is C
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392856 | C | B | Sol: As, three of them – A, C and Doctor prefer rice to chapatti and two of them – B and the Painter prefer chapatti to rice , this means A and C are not doctors while B is not a painter.
Also, Doctor prefers Rice and Painter prefers Chapatti. Further, it is given that the Teacher, D and A are friends to one another but two of these prefer chapatti to rice. This means, Teacher and D would prefer Chapatti as it is already known (in above table) that A prefers Rice. Further, as three of them prefer Rice, so E must prefer Rice. Now as A, C and Doctor prefers rice, E should be the doctor (as the other two aren’t). Also, it is known that painter prefers Chapatti, so the only possibility – D should be the painter. Further, as Teacher also prefers Chapatti – this means B is the Teacher.
From the last statement : The Singer is C’s brother – we get that C is not the singer. This means A is the singer and C is the dancer. Hence, the final table looks like –
Given Answer is C but correct answer is B
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392888 | Brothers | Brothers and First Cousins | Sol: Ravi’s younger brother’s grandmother = Ravi’s paternal grandmother (or) Ravi’s maternal grandmother
Ravi’s grandmother’s only son = Ravi’s father / Ravi’s maternal uncle Ravi’s grandmother’s only son’s wife = Ravi’s mother / Ravi’s maternal aunt The boy in the photograph is the son of Ravi’s mother/ or, Ravi’s maternal aunt i.e. Ravi and the boy in photograph are siblings i.e. brothers/ or, Ravi and boy are 1st cousins. Option, (1) and Option (2) are both correct. Given Answer is Brothers but both Brothers & First Cousins are correct.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392870 | Brother-in-law | Son | Sol: Ravi’s daughter’s father = Ravi himself (in case Ravi is a male)
Now, Ramesh is the son of his daughter’s father i.e. of Ravi i.e. Ramesh is Ravi’s son. Even if we consider Ravi to be a female, Ramesh is the son of Ravi. This question is not clear in sense that Ramesh is who’s who. Also if we talk w.r.t to Ravi, then Ramesh is Ravi’s son, which is not available in options Given Answer is Brother-in-law but actual answer should be Son/cannot be determined.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392872 | North | Cannot be determined | Sol: This question was a little vague as it was no where mentioned that house, theatre, hospital and university were all in different directions, and , also that we are not sure John walks in which direction from his house.
The correct answer for same should have been Cannot be determined. Given Answer North but correct answer Cannot be determined
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392876 | Aunt | Aunt or Mother | Sol: Ram’s mother’s father = Ram’s maternal grandfather
Only son of Ram’s maternal grandfather = Ram’s maternal uncle Now, Ram’s maternal uncle is girls mother’s brother i.e. Ram’s maternal uncle is also the girl’s maternal uncle. This means, Ram and girl could be siblings (or) cousins. Thus, girl’s mother could be related to Ram as his mother (or) aunt. Given Answer is Aunt but Correct answer is Aunt as well as Mother |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4611392869 | Brother | Brother or Cousin | Sol: Grandfather’s only son = Father / Maternal uncle (Depending on grandfather is paternal or maternal)
Thus, Prakash’s grandfather’s only son’s daughter will be Prakash’s sister or Prakash’s cousin. This means Prakash (considering him to be a male) will be the brother or cousin of the girl. Given answer is Brother but correct answer will be Brother or Cousin.
|
ENGLISH & GK SECTION
Qn ID | Given answer | Correct answer | Error | |
4611392701 | 3 | 1 | The subject of the sentence is ‘two valence states’, which is plural and so the so verb should be plural ‘occur and contribute’ hence the option should be 3.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/two-valence-states-of-uranium-one-with-a-deficit-of-four-47496.html
|
|
4611392727 | 1 | 1 and 2 both are errors | The answer given is ‘almost read’ which is correct. It should be ‘read almost half of it’. But this sentence is wrong in itself. There should have been a conjunction either in the beginning of the statement or between the two clauses as there is a cause effect relationship between the two clauses. The sentence should have started with a ‘with the hope to go through the book today, I have read almost half of it’ so there are actually two parts that have errors : part A and part D.
http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/01/can-i-start-a-sentence-with-a-conjunction/
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/almost-or-nearly
|
|
4611392744 | 1 | None of these | Uma Shankar singh is an mla from UP and not from bihar as mentioned in the question.
|
|
4611392726 |
c | None of these | This statement is correct as in the subjunctive mood (as denoted by the verb asked) the verb in the subjunctive clause will take ‘be submitted’. (
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/grammar/when-to-use-the-subjunctive
|
|
Click here to download the above file in pdf format |